Transit Oriented Development (TOD) has been seen as a strategy to accommodate increasing urban populations with reduced impacts on transportation networks and the environment in many cities. It was understood that approaches to build successful TOD differ significantly from place to place, depending upon circumstances such as differences in land development regulations, zoning ordinances, market forces, development opportunities, available transit services, regional economy, etc. Therefore, to build TOD in Ho Chi Minh City where motorcycles are prevalent in traffic flow should apply different approaches. This ongoing research tries to analyze and assess some policies dealing with motorcycles to integrate this highly maneuverable mean of transportation with MRT as well as to find out effective measures to promote pedestrians to/from MRT stations under the existing characteristics of urban form in Ho Chi Minh City.
The seminar is on Friday April 4th, from 4-5 PM in 534 Davis. Cookie Hour will be at 3:30 in the library.
This week's Friday TRANSOC Seminar features Karthik Sivakumaran, Ph.D. candidate, University of California, Berkeley, presenting "Access and the Choice of Transit Technology."
An urban transit system can be made more efficient by improving the access to it.Efforts in this vein often entail the provision of greater mobility, as when high-speed feeder buses are used to carry commuters to and from trunk-line stations.Other efforts have focused on the creation of more favorable land-use patterns, as occurs when households within a Transit-Oriented Development (TOD) are tightly clustered around trunk stations.The efficacy of these mobility and land-use solutions are separately examined in the present work.To this end, continuum approximation models are used to determine the design parameters that minimize the generalized costs to both the users and the operators of hypothetical transit networks.
Though idealized, these assessments furnish useful and very general insights.They confirm that if transit is accessed slowly on foot, as is commonly assumed in the literature, then the optimal spacings between routes, and between the stations along those routes, are quite small.This typically places capital-intensive rail systems at a competitive disadvantage with transit systems that feature buses instead.However, these spacings expand when access speeds increase.Hence, we show how Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) and Metro-Rail can become a preferred option for trunk-line service when accessed via faster-moving feeder buses.
By comparison, the influence of altered land use patterns brought by TODs is less dramatic when all users walk to Metro-rail stations.We find that clustering households around these stations justifies larger spacings between them, but produces only modest reductions in generalized costs.This is because the larger spacings penalize transit users who reside outside of the TODs.
The seminar will be held at 4:00pm in 534 Davis Hall. Don't forget about Cookie Hour in the library at 3:30! See you here.